Skip to main content

Threatening Those Who Post Bad Reviews of Your Company is Risky Business

December 22, 2015

Posted in Business Litigation

photo - bad online reviewsWe are living in the age of the consumer review, whether you’re in the market for a laptop, car, plumber or lawyer. Many of us will make buying decisions, or at least narrow down the choices, by using reviews we find on social media and websites. It has become a powerful marketing tool for business, but it’s a doubled edged sword. Positive reviews can boost sales, negative reviews can slow them down.

Some businesses have taken protecting their online reputation to extremes by suing those posting bad reviews by claiming the person violated some kind of user/purchase agreement or committed libel or defamation.

A Florida based seller of weight loss supplements is the latest company drawing attention to its aggressive actions against bad reviews. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced last month it filed a lawsuit against Roca Labs, Inc., for a number of reasons including making false claims about their products and that it threatened to enforce an invalid “gag clause” against those who posted negative reviews and testimonials online.

Roca told consumers posting negative reviews they violated a non-disparagement section of the “Terms and Conditions” they allegedly agreed to when they purchased the products. The FTC claims these provisions are not legally enforceable and subsequent warnings, threats and lawsuits filed against online reviewers were attempts to intimidate unhappy purchasers which unfairly barred them from sharing truthful, negative comments about Roca and its products.

FTC’s complaint states that,

  • Roca advertises their supposed weight loss products (including an “anti-craving” powder) online.
  • It claims the products were a safe and effective alternative to gastric bypass surgery.
  • Roca claims that users could take off as much as 21 pounds in a month and that they have a 90% success rate in losing substantial amounts of weight.
  • The company uses fake “third-party” reviews to show successes by consumers.
  • The company offered consumers a 50% discount for positive reviews while threatening those posting bad reviews they would owe the company the “full price” of the product (hundreds of dollars more than the advertised price).
  • Consumers paid $480 for a three to four month supply. The company has sold at least $20 million of these products since 2010.

Jennifer Schaive is a former customer who got Roca’s attention when she posted a bad review on the Better Business Bureau website, reports CBS News. She claims the company tried to intimidate her to force her to remove her review. Schaive describes the products as inedible “pink goo” that a doctor retained by the FTC said mostly contained dietary fibers.

Roca has also sued the owners of the Pissed Consumer website which contains numerous negative reviews about their products. An attorney for the website states they are fighting the lawsuit and have a First Amendment right to publish the reviews.

CBS quotes Mary Engle, FTC’s head of advertising practices as stating, “If companies are trying to suppress negative information, we want to stop that.”

If your business is just dealing with negative reviews, there are many ways to deal with them other than legal action but if your business truly has been the victim of libel or defamation, you should protect your rights and interests. If you think reviews of your business have crossed the line and you want to learn about your legal rights, contact my office so we can talk about the situation, the laws that apply and how you can address the problem.